ACLU-immigration-FBbanner
Immigrant's Rights
The Constitution guarantees the fundamental rights and civil liberties of every person in this country. Upholding the rights of the politically disenfranchised is vital; when the government has the power to deny legal rights and due process to one group of people, it puts all our rights in danger.

Fremont Law Still Leaves Room for Bias

E-mail Print PDF

ACLU to Appeal Ruling on Fremont Anti-Immigrant Law

Lawyers claim parts of law left standing create an “unfair burden” for clients

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 28, 2012

CONTACT:  Amy Miller, (402) 476-8091; Jennifer Chang Newell, (415) 343-0774

ACLU to Appeal Ruling on Fremont Anti-Immigrant Law

Lawyers claim parts of law left standing create an “unfair burden” for clients

LINCOLN -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska said today it intends to appeal a decision that left intact part of an anti-immigrant ordinance in the city of Fremont. Fremont’s law, passed in June 2010, was partially struck down by a federal judge on Feb. 20.

“We were gratified by the judge’s decision that key portions of the ordinance violated federal law and the Constitution,” said Jennifer Chang Newell, a staff attorney at the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project.  “We are appealing the decision only because we believe the remainder of the ordinance still imposes an illegal and unfair burden on our clients.”

The case, filed on behalf of five renters in Fremont, a city of 26,000 northwest of Omaha, as well as two landlords and two local employers, will go to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“While the courts are still reviewing this problematic and un-American law, we’ve asked the City Council to hold off from enforcement,” said ACLU Nebraska Legal Director Amy Miller.  “The city has voluntarily suspended the ordinance during the first phase of the lawsuit and we’ve asked them to continue doing so.”

A federal district judge rejected as unconstitutional provisions of the law that would have prohibited the harboring of undocumented immigrants and that would have allowed Fremont to revoke the rental licenses of persons found to be undocumented immigrants.  However, the judge let stand the provisions that would require potential renters to provide citizenship or immigration status information and pay $5 to obtain a renter's license.

A letter from ACLU Nebraska was sent to the city’s attorney earlier today, urging the Fremont City Council to wait on implementing the ordinance due to the costs to the city, the hardship generated for those affected by the ordinance, the potential for public confusion should an appeal alter the outcome in the case, and a concern that implementation may spark additional lawsuits.  A copy of the letter is online at www.aclunebraska.org

"Until the appeals process is finally resolved," noted Miller, "there is no reason to create additional burdens on both sides of the case."

###

ABOUT: ACLU Nebraska and its diverse membership works in courts, the legislature and our communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States and Nebraska guarantee everyone in this state.

 

 

Attachments:
Download this file (Fremont City Council letter.pdf)Fremont City Council letter.pdf[ ]248 Kb
 

Judge voids Fremont Immigration Ordinance

E-mail Print PDF

 

Federal Judge Voids Fremont Immigration Ordinance
Ruling says housing provisions are in conflict with Federal immigration law.

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 20, 2012

CONTACT: Jennifer Chang Newell, 415.343.0774; Amy Miller, 402.476.8091

LINCOLN – On Monday, February 20, 2012 Judge Laurie Smith Camp ruled that housing and harboring provisions of an immigration ordinance passed in Fremont, NE in June 2010 are in conflict with Federal law and therefor void. The ordinance was intended to drive-out persons alleged to be undocumented immigrants from renting homes in the 25,000-person town of Fremont.

"As every other federal court to consider a similar law has held, the Nebraska district court concluded that federal immigration law prohibits cities like Fremont from enacting their own laws to regulate housing based on immigration status. These laws are discriminatory, unfair, and unAmerican." said ACLU national attorney Jennifer Chang Newell who worked on the case.

Mario Martinez and other plaintiffs have reported that Fremont "is completely different" than it was before the ordinance passed. Incidents of discrimination and harassment from fellow residents have increased, even towards U.S. citizens such as Martinez.

"Treating residents of a community as outcast because of an unfounded allegation is contrary to Nebraska's motto of 'equality before the law,' said ACLU Nebraska legal director Amy Miller. "This victory should be a signal to other communities that 'show me your papers' is a phrase that belongs in our history books, not modern law."

Attorneys on the case, Martinez v. Fremont, include Newell and Kenneth Sugarman of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, former ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project attorneys Tanaz Moghadam and David Wakukawa and Terry Wittler; Miller of ACLU Nebraska; Nebraska trial counsel Alan Peterson of Lincoln; Michelle Sitorius of Cline Williams; Michael Nelsen of Omaha.

Attachments:
Download this file (Fremont Order 2012-02-20.pdf)Fremont Order 2012-02-20.pdf[ ]112 Kb
 


Page 4 of 8

dreamers-223x223-v08

If you are a DREAMers, share your story by filling out our complaint form.

Join us at these events!


ACLU Member Card

The need has never been greater for freedom-loving people to support the ACLU. By making a gift today, you can make sure that ACLU Nebraska has the resources it needs to continue to fight for all of our freedoms. Donate now!